NURS 4212 Week3 Assignment1R ubric
11/29/24, 9:03 PM
Start Assignment
• Due Dec 12 by 10:59pm
• Points 50
Submitting a text entry box or a file upload
Attempts 0
• Allowed Attempts 2
<<<Back to Week at a Glance
Week 3: Assignment 1
(https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/144099/modules/items/570189.
EXPLORATORY: ANNOTATED
BIBLIOGRAPHY TEMPLATE: PREPARING FOR ADVANCING HEALTH EQUITY IN ETHICAL UPSTREAM POLICIES PAPER
Preparation is key when writing an academic paper. The purpose of this Exploratory Assignment is for you to collect three scholarly references as they pertain to this module's Assignment: Advancing Health Equity in Ethical Population Health Policies Paper, which is due on Day 7.
Using the Annotated Bibliography Template, you will inform the reader of the relevance, accuracy, and quality of your three scholarly references.
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
WEEKLY RESOURCES (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/144099/modules/items/5701898)
To prepare:
• Review the Learning Resources for this module.
https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/144099/assignments/1880112?module_item_id=5701895
1/4
11/29/24, 9:03 PM
Week 3: Assignment 1
• Review the Advancing Health Equity in Ethical Population Health Policies Paper
requirements.
Begin researching to find three scholarly references, published within the last 5 years, that will be used in your paper.
• Download the Annotated Bibliography Template
(https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/144099/files/11164112?wrap=1)↓
(https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/144099/files/11164112/download?download_frd=1).
The Assignment
Complete the Annotated Bibliography Template document.
BY DAY 4 OF WEEK 3
Submit your Assignment.
SUBMISSION INFORMATION
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as
WK3Assgn1_LastName_FirstInitial
2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
WAIDEN IINIVERSITY
NURS_4212_Week3_Assignment1_Rubric
https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/144099/assignments/1880112?module_item_id=5701895
2/4
11/29/24, 9:03 PM
Criteria
Source
citation for
three sources
10 to >8.75 pts Mastered Expectations
Accurate source citations
are provided for three
relevant sources.
Week 3: Assignment 1
Ratings
8.75 to >7.33 pts Achieved Expectations
Source citations are
provided for three relevant
sources.
7.33 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet
Expectations
Source citations are
provided for three
resources, or it is missing.
Summary provided for
three sources
Evaluation
provided for
three sources
Application provided for
three sources
10 to >8.0 pts
Mastered Expectations
The response
comprehensively and clearly
summarizes three sources. The response includes relevant, specific, and
appropriate examples that
fully support the summary.
10 to >8.0 pts Mastered Expectations
The response comprehensively and clearly evaluates three sources. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support
the evaluation.
10 to >8.0 pts Mastered Expectations
The response comprehensively and clearly provides an application for three sources. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the application.
8 to >7.33 pts Achieved
7.33 to >0 pts
Expectations
The response
summarizes three
sources. The response includes relevant,
specific, and
appropriate examples that support the
summary.
8 to >7.33 pts
Achieved
Expectations
The response evaluates
three sources. The response includes
relevant, specific, and
appropriate examples that support the evaluation.
8 to >7.33 pts Achieved Expectations
The response provides an application for three sources. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that support the application.
Does Not Meet
Expectations
The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes three sources, or it is missing. The response
includes inaccurate and
vague examples that do not support the summary, or it is
missing.
7.33 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet
Expectations
The response inaccurately and vaguely evaluates three sources, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague
examples that do not
support the evaluation, or it ip.30 pts Does Not Meet Expectations
The response inaccurately and vaguely provides an application for three sources, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague
Pts
10 pts
10 pts
10 pts
10 pts
examples that do not
support the application, or it 3.06missingts
5 pts
Mastered Expectations
Professional
5 to >4.0 pts
writing:
Context,
organization,
audience,
Demonstrates full
awareness of writing
context, audience, and
4 to >3.66 pts Achieved Expectations
Demonstrates some
awareness of writing
context, audience, and
https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/144099/assignments/1880112?module_item_id=5701895
Does Not Meet Expectations
Demonstrates minimal
awareness of writing context, audience, and purpose
3/4
11/29/24, 9:03 PM
Criteria
purpose, tone, style, clarity, flow
Professional
writing: Originality,
source
credibility, and
attribution of
ideas
purpose Content is generally clear, logical, and well organized, with appropriate sentence and paragraph structure. Tone is highly professional, scholarly, and free of bias. Style is consistently appropriate for a professional
setting/workplace context. Mostly free of spelling, punctuation, and grammar/syntax errors
5 to >4.0 pts Mastered Expectations
Content fully reflects original writing and proper paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates full adherence to reference requirements, including
the use of credible evidence to support a claim, with appropriate citations and references
in APA format.
Week 3: Assignment 1
Ratings
purpose Content is mostly clear, logical, and well organized, with adequate sentence and paragraph
structure. Tone is
adequately professional, scholarly, and/or free of bias. Style is mostly appropriate for a professional setting/workplace context. Contains a few spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors
4 to >3.66 pts Achieved Expectations
Content adequately reflects original writing and paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates adequate adherence to reference
requirements, including the
use of credible evidence to
support a claim, with appropriate citations and
references in APA format.
There are a few minor APA
formatting errors.
Content lacks clarity, logic, and/or discernible
organization; content does not use proper sentence and paragraph structure. Tone is not professional/scholarly and/or contains bias. Style is
inconsistent with a
professional setting/workplace context. Contains significant spelling, punctuation, and/or grammar/syntax errors
3.66 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet
Expectations
Content does not reflect
original writing and/or paraphrasing. Writing demonstrates minimal or no
adherence to reference
requirements, including the use of credible evidence to
support a claim, with appropriate citations and
references in APA format.
There are numerous APA formatting errors.
Pts
5 pts
Total Points: 50
https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/144099/assignments/1880112?module_item_id=5701895
4/4
NURS 4212: Population Health Nursing
Annotated Bibliography Template:
Health Equity in Ethical Population Health Policies Paper
Student Name Here
Program Name or Degree Name, Walden University
Course Number, Section, and Title
(Example: NURS 0000 Section 01, Title of Course)
Instructor Name
Month, Day, Year
(Enter the date submitted to Instructor.)
1. Source Citation #1 published in past 5 years (7th ed. APA format):
a) Summary:
Summarize the main content of the source in a few sentences.
b) Evaluation:
Provide a brief evaluation of the source, considering its relevance, reliability, and quality.
c) Application:
Explain how this source will be used in your research or project in a few sentences.
2. Source Citation #2 published in past 5 years (7th ed. APA format):
1
2
a) Summary:
Summarize the main content of the source in a few sentences.
b) Evaluation:
Provide a brief evaluation of the source, considering its relevance, reliability, and quality.
c) Application:
Explain how this source will be used in your research or project in a few sentences.
3. Source Citation #3 published in past 5 years (7th ed. APA format):
a) Summary:
Summarize the main content of the source in a few sentences.
b) Evaluation:
Provide a brief evaluation of the source, considering its relevance, reliability, and quality.
c) Application:
Explain how this source will be used in your research or project in a few sentences.
